Skip to main content

Only 12% of drone victims in Pakistan identified as militants: report

KARACHI: A recent research by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism found that only 12% of drone victims in Pakistan have been identified as militants. Moreover, the research also stated that fewer than 4% of the people killed have been identified as members of al Qaeda.  
The research contradicts US Secretary of State John Kerry’s claim last year that only “confirmed terrorist targets at the highest level” were fired at.
The number of US drone strikes in Pakistan has hit 400 between June 2004 and October 2013.
Of the 2,370 people killed in these strikes, 704 have been identified, of which only 295 were reported to be members of some kind of armed group.

More than a third of them were not designated a rank, and almost 30% are not even linked to a specific group.
The Bureau has a project titled Naming the Dead, which has gathered the names and details of people killed by CIA drones in Pakistan since June 2004.
According to Mustafa Qadri, a Pakistani researcher for Amnesty International, the findings “demonstrate the continuing complete lack of transparency surrounding US drone operations.”
Responding to the Bureau’s investigation, US National Security Council spokesperson Caitlin Hayden said that the strikes were only carried out when there was “near-certainty” that no civilians would be killed.
“The death of innocent civilians is something that the US Government seeks to avoid if at all possible. In those rare instances in which it appears non-combatants may have been killed or injured, after-action reviews have been conducted to determine why, and to ensure that we are taking the most effective steps to minimise such risk to non-combatants in the future,” said Hayden.
Leaked documents show that the US believes determining a militant is an imminent threat that “does not require the United States to have clear evidence that a specific attack on US persons and interests will take place in the immediate future.”
Moreover, according to the Authorisation for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) – a law signed by Congress three days after the September 11 2001 attacks — the president has the right to use “all necessary and appropriate force” against those behind the attacks on the US, wherever they are.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Celebrating Eid ul Adha 2024: Traditions, Wishes, and Joy

Celebrating Eid ul Adha 2024: Traditions, Wishes, and Joy Muslims around the world are preparing to enjoy this auspicious ocassion of Eid Ul Adha which is a significant event, with joy and devotion. Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham) abide the will of Allah Almighty to sacrifice his son as an act of obedience to Allah Almighty so this event is remembered as the "Festival of Sacrifice,". This ocassion, also known as Eid al-Adha or Eid Qurban Mubarak, is a time for prayer, charity, and festive gatherings. The Significance of Eid ul Adha There is a special importance of this event in Muslim circles. It is celebrated on the 10th of Last Hajj Months that is Dhul-Hijjah, also the last month of the Islamic lunar calendar. Hajj pilgrimage the most priviliged obligation is also connected to Eid ul Adha. Other than Hijaz around the world the event mostly celebrated by sacrificing animals like goats, sheep, cows, or camels to honor the sacrifice made by Prophet Ibrahim. The meat of sacrificial a...

Pakistan-Idea to State and Reality

Pakistan-Idea to State and Reality By Dr. Minhaj Qidwai Stephen Philip Cohen, in The Idea of Pakistan, cites Al-Biruni as a source of ideas for Jinnah and Ayub Khan. Al-Biruni’s India is admittedly one of the most penetrative accounts of Indian society, but a society of the 11th century, not the 20th. He also observed that the “Hindus are totally different from the Muslims in religion. This is, of course, true but it isn’t such a profound observation as to have informed either Jinnah or the Field Marshal of what they were unaware. Jinnah wanted a secular dressing, whereas Ayub made it Islamic. Did this deviance had an impact on Pakistan? Did it made a difference between a “right government…which aims at general good” and “a deviation…which aims at its own good”. Was Pakistani state’s preoccupation with “its own good” resulted in a near-permanent deviation of governance itself? Above all, what was the need for creation of Pakistan. With the Second World War, Atlantic charter was signed ...

At the beginning of the change will be from Gilgit-Baltistan, Pervez Musharraf

ISLAMABAD: President Pervez Musharraf said at the beginning of the change from Gilgit-Baltistan, Chitral, and then change will be occur in the whole country, people of the CHITRAL should vote to the APML. In Islamabad, Ex-General Musharaf said in a speech Sunday, those who do wrong, they do promise nothing after the elections are missing for five years. He said his time he presided over a number of times in Gilgit and Chitral district of Gilgit-Baltistan and Chitral back to visit many rental development work. Pervaz Musharaf said the in his time he visited many time to Gilgit-baltistan and Chitral and raise more projects there and many improvements there, but he argue that those projects which he has introduced/started but could not completed so far. The former President said that every Pakistani do play its ro...